Technical Details Task Assignment

Posted: January 19th, 2023

Description
Assignment 3: Technical Details Task
Hide Assignment Information
Turnitin®
This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin®.
Instructions
For the final assignment, summarize the site requirements and/or any challenges (changes to the topology as you detailed in Assignments 1 and 2) you are attempting to overcome. You should also provide an updated overall site topology based on your design.
This solution should be comprehensive, and the approach should be justified. Configurations of technologies should be written out to help guide the systems administrators with implementation. In some cases, you may find it necessary to implement additional cabling, which can be done by adding to the supplied topology. Any adjustments to the sites’ topology should be documented and supplied with your submission.
Use the Final Network Proposal Template to record your work.
How Will My Work Be Evaluated?
1.2.2: Employ a format, style, and tone appropriate to the audience, context, and goal.
1.3.3: Integrate appropriate credible sources to illustrate and validate ideas.
2.1.3: Explain the significance of the issue or problem.
2.3.1: State conclusions or solutions clearly and precisely.
2.3.2: Incorporate relevant evidence to support the position.
2.3.3: Explain inferences and deductions that follow logically from the evidence provided.
10.1.3: Define the specifications of required technologies.
12.1.3: Communicate policies, processes, and/or procedures to stakeholders.
13.1.1: Create documentation appropriate to the stakeholder.
When you are finished, submit your final paper to the dropbox below.
Review the syllabus for information about late policies and resubmitted assignments.
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Deliverable 3: Technical Details Task
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.
Evaluation Criteria
Exceeds
Meets
Approaches
Does not Meet
Criterion Score
1.2.2: Employ a format, style, and tone appropriate to the audience, context, and goal.
6 points
Employs a format, style, and tone completely appropriate to the audience, context, and goal.
5.1 points
Employs a format, style, and tone appropriate to the audience, context, and goal.
4.5 points
Attempts to employ a format, style, and tone appropriate to the audience, context, and goal, but there are gaps.
0 points
Style employed is not appropriate to audience, context, or goal.
/ 6
1.3.3: Integrate appropriate credible sources to illustrate and validate ideas.
8 points
Integrates completely appropriate and highly credible sources to illustrate and validate ideas.
6.8 points
Integrates appropriate credible sources to illustrate and validate ideas.
6 points
Attempts to integrate sources to illustrate and validate ideas, but there are problems with source credibility or appropriateness, or the integration is choppy.
0 points
Does not integrate sources to illustrate and validate ideas.
/ 8
2.1.3: Explain the significance of the issue or problem.
8 points
Explains the significance of the issue or problem succinctly and thoroughly.
6.8 points
Explains the significance of the issue or problem.
6 points
Attempts to explain the significance of the issue or problem, but the explanation is not clear or is not appropriate for the context.
0 points
Does not explain the significance of the issue or problem.
/ 8
2.3.1: State conclusions or solutions clearly and precisely.
8 points
States well-conceived conclusions or solutions clearly and precisely.
6.8 points
States conclusions or solutions clearly and precisely.
6 points
Attempts to state conclusions or solutions, but they are not clear or precise.
0 points
Does not state conclusions or solutions.
/ 8
2.3.2: Incorporate relevant evidence to support the position.
8 points
Incorporates relevant evidence thoroughly and appropriately to support the position.
6.8 points
Incorporates relevant evidence to support the position.
6 points
Attempts to incorporate relevant evidence to support the position, but the evidence is not adequate.
0 points
Does not incorporate relevant evidence to support the position.
/ 8
2.3.3: Explain inferences and deductions that follow logically from the evidence provided.
8 points
Explains clearly the inferences and deductions that follow logically from the evidence provided.
6.8 points
Explains inferences and deductions that follow logically from the evidence provided.
6 points
Attempts to explain inferences and deductions, but the explanation is not clear, or the inferences do not follow logically from the evidence provided.
0 points
Does not explain inferences and deductions that follow logically from the evidence provided.
/ 8
10.1.3: Define the specifications of required technologies.
18 points
Defines thoroughly and clearly the specifications of required technologies.
15.3 points
Defines the specifications of required technologies.
13.5 points
Attempts to define the specifications of required technologies, but there are gaps and/or lack of clarity.
0 points
Does not define the specifications of required technologies.
/ 18
12.1.3: Communicate policies, processes, and/or procedures to stakeholders.
18 points
Clearly explains all relevant policies, processes, and/or procedures to stakeholders.
15.3 points
Communicate policies, processes, and/or procedures to stakeholders.
13.5 points
Attempts to communicate policies, processes, and/or procedures to stakeholders, but there are gaps and/or inaccuracies.
0 points
Does not communicate policies, processes, and/or procedures to stakeholders.
/ 18
13.1.1: Create documentation appropriate to the stakeholder.
18 points
Creates thorough and accurate IT documentation that exceeds requirements.
15.3 points
Creates IT documentation that meets requirements.
13.5 points
Creates IT documentation that lacks detail and/or does not fully meet requirements.
0 points
Does not create appropriate IT documentation.
/ 18
Rubric Total Score
Total
/ 100
Rubric Name: Deliverable 3: Technical Details Task